<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Precision on felladog</title><link>https://utsavdarlami.github.io/blogs/tags/precision/</link><description>Recent content in Precision on felladog</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2022 15:36:55 +0545</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://utsavdarlami.github.io/blogs/tags/precision/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>ML Model Evaluation</title><link>https://utsavdarlami.github.io/blogs/notes/20210224162319-model_evaluations_score/</link><pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2021 16:23:00 +0545</pubDate><guid>https://utsavdarlami.github.io/blogs/notes/20210224162319-model_evaluations_score/</guid><description>references To Read: https://towardsdatascience.com/handling-imbalanced-datasets-in-machine-learning-7a0e84220f28 https://datascience.stackexchange.com/questions/15989/micro-average-vs-macro-average-performance-in-a-multiclass-classification-settin questions ml model evaluation methods
Classfication True Positive (TP) Positive class correctly labeled/predicted False Negative (FN) Positive class incorrectly labeled/predicted False Positive (FP) Negative class incorrectly labeled/predicted True Negative (TN) Negative class correctly labeled/predicted Accuracy It is simply a ratio of correctly predicted observation to the total observations. Accuracy = \(\frac{TP + TN}{TP + TN + FN + FP}\) Precision Precision = \(\frac{True Positive}{True Positive + False Positive}\) From all the postive prediction given by our hypothesis/model how many examples were true positive Recall Recall = \(\frac{True Positive}{True Positive + False Negative}\) From all the postive examples how many examples were correctly classified by our hypothesis/model F1 Score A harmonic mean between recall and precision</description></item></channel></rss>